Jezebels Defend Paul Up UNTIL Paul Says: Women Keep Silence, Do Not USURP Authority Over Men, Wear Head Coverings!

INTRO

Join Doug as he uncovers the double-bind some poor Paulinitess women find themselves in when they go to vocalize their loyalty to Paul and defend him (deceiving themselves that Paul actually represented Christ when he rather contradicted our Savior and His Father left and right). 

As they do speak up in his defense, they are stuck with some pretty harsh writings of their leader, Paul, when he said women are supposed to KEEP SILENT, NOT USURP AUTHORITY OR TEACH MEN, & BY ALL MEANS, COVER THEIR HEADS! 

The funny thing is that the head covering thing is A LAW HE TOOK FROM THE JEWISH ORAL TRADITION (THAT JESUS RAILED AGAINST) while HE MADE HIS OWN LAWS among Believers!  Poor, poor women who serve Paul are now under an immense oppression as they believe wrongly that they should ignore God's law (though Jesus taught in Matthew 5 that He did not come to do away with the Law and that the greatest among us would do and teach the commandments), but with Paul they get a whole bunch of other rules and laws that SHUT THEM UP and PUT CURTAINS AND DRAPES ON THEIR HEADS!  Go figure!  Satan will gladly trade you the freedom of God's law, which James called The Perfect Law of Liberty, for the shackles of his foolishness and Paul was his emissary to do just that.

This is a clarion call for women who follow Paul rather than Jesus to repent and flip the script, to serve Christ and Him alone, to follow His teachings, NOT PAUL'S OR ACTS!

MAIN BODY

Truly, it is amazing how "Christian" women (wait, I'm not calling them Christian anymore, I mean they follow Paul and not Christ, so...).  Let's start over, it truly is amazing how some "Paulinitess" women venerate and vocally defend Paul, and will engage a man (me, in this instance) in discussions where they intend to teach me that I'm wrong (though they can't explain how, nor argue a single point I've made) and that I am apostate and a false prophet, ironically, just as I claim Paul to be.  

This phenomena very much reminds me of the liberal feminists who stand up for Islam, because deep down, these women DO NOT agree with Paul about many things any more than the feminists agree with Burqas and no drivers licenses.  The Paulinitesses in particular don't agree with Paul's rules with regard to how women interact with men.  If they did, they wouldn't even speak to me, a man, about it, right? I mean, look what Paul wrote about women speaking in Church to the Corinthians:

According to Paul, women are supposed to keep silence in the Churches and if they want to learn anything they need to ask their husbands, and the final stab is, "...it is a shame for women to speak in church." Hmmm.  Notice also that here Paul says that WHAT HE WRITES, "UNTO YOU ARE THE COMMANDMENTS OF THE LORD."  The hutzpah of this guy!  In all his epistles he completely does away with God's commandments/law and says nobody can keep it and those who try are under a curse and now HIS WORDS WITH REGARD TO WOMEN ARE GOD'S COMMANDMENTS. Does this mean that women who don't keep these commandments of his lose their salvations while if they break God's Commandments they don't? Very interesting!  

To make matters worse for these women who engage me, a man, in regard to correcting me as to what God is leading me to speak in identifying Paul as the slithering demon he is, Paul says this to Timothy:

He "suffers not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence." Also very interesting.

So these Paulinitesses who seek me out to teach me not to disrespect their "master" defy their master in so doing. I mean, didn't Paul just advise that as women they are not to teach me anything, nor to usurp my MANLY MAN MANISH AUTHORITY NOR TO EVEN SPEAK AT ALL??? :P.

So these Jezebels screech and moan when MEN like me point out that Paul contradicted Jesus and the First Testament in every way, making his own law, and here he is making his own law that women can't speak in Church!

I guess it's good that Anna the Prophetess didn't know this law when she announced to the temple the arrival of our Messiah, Jesus Christ our Lord:

Poor Anna must have spoken out of turn there.  Too bad Paul was either just being born himself, or was pretty young, and wasn't there to stop her.  I mean, the gall of her to open her mouth in the temple!

But hey, overall, I do believe that woman should not take authority over men, and I believe the rest of scripture bears that out.  You can see here in Isaiah that God is insulting Israel over women and children ruling over them due to their sin:

It is clear that men are supposed to lead, but this does not mean women lose all forms of expression and communication.  Yes it's evil and bad the Jezebel spirit is quite often at work in these last days and women should not be allowed to take over:

But in my view this does not justify muzzling women like animals in the Church, forcing them to only ask questions of their husbands at home. If the women in the Church can ask questions with humility and consideration for the time of the person they are engaging, then perhaps we don't need to stick some gorilla tape over their mouths?

The funny thing is, most Pauline Churches in general have lots of women working in ministry, teaching Day of the Sun School, and involved in all sorts leadership and administration.  Some even have women Pastors and Worship Leaders, and they, too, ignore their master, Paul, in this area and just take up all sorts of roles that require them to teach men.  I'm actually on Paul's side in this regard: WOMAN SHOULD NOT TEACH MEN.  But that doesn't mean we silence and ignore women altogether.

Women were good enough to be the first to see Jesus after His resurrection and were sent to tell the Apostles.  Jesus spoke to the woman at the well, and let Mary (the sister of Lazarus) sit as his feet listening to His teaching.  No, woman aren't men, and aren't meant to be, but goshdarnit, women are people, too!

Getting back to Paul and his lawmaking, although he begs off of the head covering law he institutes at the end of his two paragraph argument for it, he still managed to get some sects of Believers to cause their women to honor it to this day.  This is in spite of the fact that NO SUCH COMMANDMENT EXISTS IN THE TORAH!  (More on this later, with receipts).

Paul starts off this chapter of 1 Corinthians reminding a group of people to keep his, "ordinances, as I have deliver them to you."  So Paul, the Law of God destroyer, brings yet more of his own ordinances, and this time having to do with women, and as said before, not with something from the Torah, but from the oral law which became the Talmud and the Kabbalistic teachings of apostate Judaism.

Here we have Paul arguing for head coverings.  Some people think he is only speaking of long hair, but it had long been an established Jewish Custom that women wear a fabric covering over their heads.

Side note: there's also an interesting reference to "power on her head because of the angels..."with regard to head coverings. I've heard it said this was in regard to the fallen angels and protecting women from their lusts, as in what the Book of Enoch reports about the fallen angels lusting for, sleeping with and impregnating women.  But I digress because I didn't have time to look deeper on this for this study.

Then he asks does not nature teach that a man with long hair, it is a shame unto him, but every time I read that I think of the Nazarite vow which requires the man to NOT cut his hair for the duration of vow (Numbers 6).  This was the vow Samson was under (Judges 13).  Then, after all of this talk, he refers to the woman's long hair as a covering.  So wait, a woman's natural hair is a covering that God made, but that's not good enough?  She needs a fabric, too?  

And then, for the piece de resistance, he finally says, "But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God."

Wait, what?  You just go on this long diatribe and, perhaps unbeknownst to you at the time, but a head covering law on various sects and denominations of "Churchianity" for nearly 2000 years has abided by, and then you basically say, "If anybody has a problem, fugedddabboutit."  

So where did Paul get this idea for head covering?  From Jewish Oral Tradition OUTSIDE OF THE TORAH.  But before I address this, I want to first show you Jesus' attitude to these traditions of the "elders" which were NOT part of God's law.

What had happened with Judaism is not any different than what's happened to Christianity through Catholicism and mainline denominations. Their traditions began to usurp and OVERRIDE God's Word/law.  These are the commandments of men Jesus is speaking of.  If head coverings for women was so important, FOR SURE AND CERTAIN God would have included it in His law.  We will now see some of the reasons head coverings were given to women, which appear to have been driven more in causing married women to wear them as a symbol of her dedication and devotion to her husband, much as a woman would wear a wedding ring in this day.  It was NOT a symbol of devotion to God, per se, but to her husband.

So we see how the origin of the head covering in Jewish tradition comes outside the commandments of God and is not a requirement.  Clearly Paul had been raised up in all the oral law and traditions as a Pharisee, and rather than compel new Believers to keep God's law, the Torah, he forced on them these false man-made traditions!   

In another epistle to a different group, this time the Thessalonians, Paul made sure to COMMAND them to keep the traditions they had "received from us" (his group) as he told them to FOLLOW US and to see that his group had made themselves "...an ensemble unto you to follow us"! 

This man did not teach people to follow Christ's WORDS, but a false idea of Christ HE HAD DRUMMED UP.  Tell me, in all Paul's writings, how many times does he quote Jesus Christ from His earthly ministry? One time he says it's more blessed to give than receive and he also makes references to Jesus' last supper command to take of the bread and wine in remembrance of Him.  But there's very little more than that.  

Instead, Paul took away the Gentiles opportunity to make an everlasting covenant with the Father through circumcision.  He stole their chance to observe God's Sabbath and Holy Feasts.  He taught them they could still eat things sacrificed to idols and all of the unclean and abominable meats and sea creatures that God went to great lengths to warn us from eating.  He robbed God's truths from us and instead GAVE WOMEN HEAD COVERINGS and plenty of other rules and regulations as he saw fit.  This is the epitome of Satanic narcissism: to rob of us of God's goodness and to replace it with evil.  

Returning to a woman's place in leadership or in the teaching of men, I have to acknowledge that while what Paul said in this regard was in many ways extreme, there is good reason for men not to be gelded by women nor to give over their position in God's hierarchy to them.  

But I had an interesting thought as to why Paul would want to completely shut women down.  What if some of them saw through his chicanery and slimy used car salesman lying ways and began to say, "Hey, what you're telling us is against God's Word!"?  Shutting down women would guarantee he could eliminate at least 50% of his critics and keep their chirping about his foolishness to their homes.  I bet many women of God saw right through this bastard.  (Yeah, I said it, he was pure evil.)

As this ministry has criticized Paul, and not only that, but we've pointed out he is one of the most evil men ever to have lived, thanks to Paul's writings about women's interactions with men, we have had this ability to use his own words to shut down his female supporters who criticize us as well. When the Paulinitesses come with all their hyperbole and ad hominems, I simply argue back, "Well, if Paul is your master and you venerate him so much, how dare you question and try to teach me, a man? You are breaking his rules by doing so. HYPOCRITES!"

I must admit that for me it’s such a delightful and delicious way to stop them down because people that won't address the manifold number of issues that we've presented and just make ad hominems are the most annoying of all chirping birds, using Paul's own words against them only serves to show my original premise that these women don’t really serve Paul in the holistic sense. They simply cherry pick his teachings to serve themselves, but deep down they don't approve of him in this area either.

Before God led me into the depths of Paul's error, I also cherry picked him for the things he said that actually support holiness and commandment keeping.  Yes, it's there, but Paul runs a constant Hegelian dialectic with his "thrown spaghetti at the wall" writings, so you can argue any side with what he's written simply by looking for it.  

For an example of this, read 1 Corinthians 8 where Paul teaches you how to eat things sacrificed to idols.  Then read chapter 10 where He proclaims, "But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils. Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils. Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he" (1 Cor 10:20-22)?  Which is it Paul???  He actually argued both sides in the SAME LETTER!!! And the second argument was the correct one. Paul was a double-minded man, in many cases, unstable in all his ways!  But Satan leading him to be so was rather clever in the sense that he could ensure Paul's writings stayed in vogue as long as all factions could pull their viewpoint from him.  Paul is why we have hundreds of denominations all doing different things, like letting their women talk and even teach, or shutting them up entirely and making them wear head coverings.

People that hate God and want an excuse NOT to do his commandments ALWAYS turn to Paul for justification.  It helps them to feel good about themselves while they continue in sin, allowing them to continue in the performance of their pagan rituals, but what they fail to realize is they are now also chained to PAUL'S RULES, HIS ORDINANCES, HIS LAWS.

What a strange juxtaposition.  Paul teaches you to hate God's law while creating his own.  What Paul promotes doesn't provide for freedom, but rather a bondage, and Paul, more than anyone else, has put women in a type of bondage with his epistles more than any other man in Biblical history.  Sure, most women must gloss over and ignore his words with regard to silence, usurping men and head coverings in order to avoid that bondage, but the further into Paul's trap they go, the likelihood of having to honor all of his teachings increases, especially when people who are against Paul call their bluff and use his own words against them.

Jezebel hates rules, and she hates Paul's rules over her as much as much as God's law, but she must go along with Paul in order to continue in her sin, to teach people to eat things sacrificed to idols and to commit fornication.  She needs 1 Corinthians 8, Romans and Galatians to continue in her free-for-all Churchianity.  Jezebel serves many idols, and many demon gods, and her job is to help people do so.  With Paul, she can keep going with her Christmas and Easter paganism, and even day of the sun sabbath.  But even in the law-keeping side of the Church she is there to get the people with more hidden, harder to observe sins, and if she's still pushing Paul after all of this instruction of the obvious contradictions between his teachings and the teachings of Christ, you know there's a demon running her show to get our eyes off our ONLY TRUE SHEPHERD.

I pray every woman and every man who calls themselves by the name of Christ will stop serving devils through Paul's teachings and set their eyes on God the Father, His Holy Law, His High Holy Standard that He spoke with His own mouth from the mount: The Ten Commandments, on the rest of His law given by Moses, and on the teachings of HIS BELOVED SON, JESUS CHRIST THE RIGHTEOUS.

"High Body Count" Converts to Christ: What Happens Now?

Before we begin our discussion, I would like us to first read a scripture passage from Deuteronomy 22.  For many of us, including people brought up in "traditional christian" homes, the strict guidance with regard to sexual activity may come not only as a surprise, but a shock. 

You can see here that not only was an incredible value placed on virginity, but there was a high price for giving it away outside of marriage, and that price included a death penalty according to the law.

Now we live in a day and age where even heterosexual behavior outside of marriage is seen as prudish and where taking it beyond that into all sorts of wanton perversion, including incest, pedophilia, beastiality, trans, poly, etc. is the norm.  Of course, all of these behaviors are forbidden as well by Leviticus chapter 20 and Satan does everything in his power to get us to do them in order that we can join him in offending God:

You can see from this chapter that there were also death penalty ramifications for certain types of incest, beastiality, homosexuality and even harsh judgments for sleeping with a menstruating woman.  

Sexuality is NO JOKE from God's perspective.  I think back to the first time I read these passages and realized what a piece of garbage sinner I was.  It was like my eyes were opened to just how diabolically evil I had been growing up, and just how evil the movies, music videos and dirty magazine I had been exposed to since my single digit years were in helping to mold me into a person who saw any type of sexuality as a natural right rather than as a bondage forming grotesque set of behaviors that were abominations to God.

I imagine that some of you, even lifelong "Christians" who have never really read the Word for yourselves are as equally surprised as I was at the high bar God has set for us in the area of sexuality.  For many new Believers there is no moment of shame though, no moment where they realize, "Wow, according to God's law I should have suffered death for my behavior. I am so ashamed."

It is very clear the intention is that men and women are not supposed to be having sex outside of marriage and that we should be virgins (outside of circumstances such as when one of the participants has been widowed or was cheated on in the last marriage or for men, if they were in polygynous life long commitments).  Yes, men could marry and not have to prove virginity, but the fact remains, if all women are supposed to be virgins, and fornication is forbidden as well as adultery, it stands to reason the expectation is that men should be virgins when they marry as well (sans the reasons listed above).

This means if you have an "outside of marriage" body count of one or more, without repentance, you are in sin.  As alluded to before, modern scruples would say anyone with three or less is like a prude, fuddy-duddy, or goodie-two-shoes, but God sees any number higher than zero as a sin and an abomination.

Having said that, when you repent, God does run out to meet you to receive you into His kingdom and to wash your sins away in the precious blood of His Son Jesus Christ.  He will forgive you and make you brand new.

But what I think many new converts don't understand, is that although you've been born again and your sins have been wiped away no more to ever be remembered, there are still consequences for our choices, and at times, God requires we still face them.  Not every consequence for what we've done in our old lives  from old lives goes away, even though God has forgiven us.  We can definitely experience a tremendous amount of grace and forgiveness even from people in the world in these matters, but we are still responsible for our behaviors and to make things right if we can.  What I'm trying to get to is, are high body count people who have repented even eligible to marry once they are born again?

I say this because I'll hear high body count people who get saved, male and female, often say, now that I'm walking with the Lord I'm ready to marry a decent person, one who is also saved and towing the line.  Even new Believers saved less than six months seem to think God is going to bless them practically right away with the right awesome Believing partner, and that there are no consequences to behaviors they were involved in less than a year prior, and that the one they get should just overlook that old life and instead of getting someone who is a virgin or who has a proven track record of celibacy, that this strong Believer should just say, "You're the one! Where have you been all my life?"

It's an extreme form of entitlement that, as stated above, doesn't show any true shame for having hurt God, and one that thinks he or she is above consequences.

This is no surprise when people come into the mainline, Pauline, once-saved-always-saved, hyper grace movement Churches where they actually teach you believe that everything you've done can just get swept under the rug without any real repentance, but I have found by experience that this just isn't the case.  There are consequences because they teach us not to go down that road again.

I'll give you an example of a sin outside of sexuality and see if you see what I mean.  Let's imagine I was a thief and stole and diamond encrusted Rolex from a jewelry store last month.  Now let's say I haven't been caught yet, but had a real saving experience with Jesus and now am genuinely saved.  Does getting saved mean I don't need to turn myself in or return the stolen watch?  Or, let's say a few weeks from now surveillance footage reveals my identity to the police and they come to my door to arrest me, do I get to say, "Officer, you can't arrest me, I got saved a couple of weeks ago and God forgives me of my sin so you there shouldn't be an repercussions or jail time for me since He has done so"?

You see my point.  The ripple effect of that sin and its repercussions would still occur whether I've been saved or not.  Now of course, God can and does show much mercy once were saved and I believe even moves on our situations and on those involved to grant us that mercy, but there could still be repercussions and I would simply have to face them.

Such is the case with becoming a Believer after leaving years of promiscuity behind where we showed absolutely no sexual discipline at all and did whatever Satan led us to do.  God may require quite a period of celibacy just to reset our minds, hearts and bodies from what we did.  He also may require a rather long stint of purity just to qualify you to be married to someone who also is pure.  Or, God may ordain that you never marry, that the sexual sin of your past precludes you from marrying now.

In fact, this is one of the toughest questions for me: can a formerly promiscuous person who has not repented and become born again actually get a reset?  What about a person who had been married prior to becoming born again, not just once but maybe two or three times and divorced for unbiblical grounds?  Is that person valid to remarry just because of becoming born again?  Or, would God rather such a person show their true repentance by getting control of their sexuality and living the remainder of his or her life celibate?  I would imagine, in many cases, the latter.

For many people, an unwillingness to follow God without access to sex may be identifying the idol of sex in the person's heart.  Jesus said we must lose our lives to save them.  If you have been a sex worshipper in your past, perhaps God will make you lay sex down as you are now in service to Him.  How much sex is enough anyway?

I suppose each case is a unique one that God would have to decide based on the merits, but I truly do believe there are so many high body count new Believers who just expect God will now bring them the "perfect" mate in spite of a long history of Torah death penalty warranting behavior.  I feel this reaction is highly narcissistic and that all of us need to consider that the reason many of us are not married now as Believers could be the sexual behaviors of our past that disqualified us from access to the Biblical model of marriage in our futures.

Also, in the world to come there will neither be marriage nor giving in marriage, and we all shall be as the angels then not having sex ever again.  

I believe such will be the case because of the dirty foul mess Satan, his demons and nearly almost all of humanity made sex into, making into an idol to put before God.  There will be no more sun or moon in the world to come either, which also became objects of worship in this nasty world.  God is truly hitting a reset and taking away that which was so sullied.

With that in mind, many of those who have converted to faith in the True Shepherd, our Messiah, Jesus Christ, need to put sex in that perspective in our hearts and minds.  Sure, be open to God's leading with this regard, but also be clear that God would rather you let go of something if it causes you to sin than to keep it.  He wants you to lose your life to save it, to pluck out your eye and chop off your hand if they cause you to sin.  

The bar is very high in this regard, like 100 feet high, and most of us have been swimming in the subterranean mud in this regard.  Some of us need to face the consequences of this and embrace the celibate life, sans the sin that so easily besets us, at least until we are certain God approves of our marrying.  So many of us are so accustomed to letting the flesh dictate the terms of our lives in this regard that we can't hear above its hollers the still small voice of God saying, "no, not now".  Time to get control of our flesh so that we may serve God first and foremost and accept His decision in this regard for the time when He says, IF He says.  I pray God will strengthen us to do so in the mighty name of Jesus.  A-men.

Is Straightway Truth a Freemasonic Cult? Straightway Truth or Broadway Lies?

I don’t write this blog (or publish this podcast) with pleasure.  In fact, it pains me to know that people that seem to teach others to keep the commandments could potentially be part of a wider conspiracy to bait people with the promise of fellowship with other commandment keepers only to switch them over to Satan’s kingdom.

If such is the case, and I 100% believe it is so with Straightway, the cleverness of Satan's plan must be acknowledged in the way one does when remembering Jesus' Words, "Be wise as a serpent and harmless as a dove," because these 4d level tactics to create controlled opposition traps for these truth seekers, such as Straightway, Jehovah's Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists, and even many versions of Messianic Judaism and Hebrew Roots movements, is a strategic warfare tactic of the highest order.  You think you're free, and then you're ensnared again.   

If you think about it, this is a wise warfare strategy on Satan's part as he must do something to capture the people leaving the paganized Church that celebrates Christmas, Easter, and Sunday Sabbath, these sincere ones who are finally coming into the truth about keeping the Commandments, because it is these Believers who are the ONLY ONES who are actually dangerous to Satan's kingdom.  When a commandment keeper practices deliverance/spiritual warfare, the Satanic hordes are BRUTALIZED, TRAMPLED UPON and DEFEATED.  What enemy wouldn't want to limit exposure to such guaranteed defeats?  

Taking it a step further, the next objective would be to limit those people's abilities to preach the power giving Gospel (which includes commandment keeping) in order to lessen, diminish and remove their ability to help create more soldiers for God. What better way than to sequester them off in some commune overly focused on taking multiple wives and making babies, focusing on expanding your own kingdom rather than the Father's?  The harvest is indeed great and the laborers are few, why not stick the only ones who truly qualify to minister in one spot under the megalomaniacal control of the group's leaders, rendering them useless to the Father, and hiding their talent in the sand rather than going out and making more talents?

Not only does Satan effectively stop the commandment keepers' growth in these cults as Believers and ministers of the Word, but he turns them into idolaters of their "Pastor" and other leadership as they begin to obey a man or men in the stead of God. But the "piece de resistance" is that Satan can also rob the salvations of all the people these Believers would have touched in the world outside of the commune.  Hiding them in a Tennessee (or any of Straightway's other) compound(s) is the perfect way to hide their light under a bushel and keep them from proclaiming the gospel throughout the world. They would no longer be wheat among the tares, or lights of the world, but hidden under the Straightway bushel.

With so many of the children of God sequestered, this leaves all the outreach to "Pastor" Dowell and his "ordained" minion "elders" and "teachers," who as Masons, teach a false version of the faith to either get new followers, or to confuse and/or alienate those who won't join them from wanting anything to do with God at all.  The best tactic for this is to absolutely destroy anyone who tries to leave with gaslighting and bullying tactics.  And then to have some questionable practices to boot.

Pretty easy to alienate a large swath of society when you brandish assault weapons on your YouTube channel and in your church services.

Or when you teach and practice polygyny in a country and state whose laws forbid it and whose culture certainly would not understand it, and then make it your job to teach polygyny to the world instead of the saving gospel.

So now, these actions that seem looney on their own merits serve to diminish and negate the actual truths your ministry claims to espouse, such as keeping the commandants.  This is one of Satan's most clever tricks: keep God's people from keeping the commandments by causing the ones who promote doing so to look crazy and cult-like. It's the Alex Jones approach.  He sprung a lot of truths on the world while acting like a buffoon, rendering anyone else who believed those truths tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists. In my view, the freemasons started Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh Day Adventism with just that intent, not so ironically in the same century as the Black Hebrew Israelite faith arose, also started by, you guessed it, freemasons, but more on this later.

The other thing Straightway does is constantly imply that "Christianity" is evil and satanic.  What they are right about is that the pagan/masonic version of "Christianity" is indeed satanic, but what these pagans faking Christianity are doing by breaking God's commandments is decidedly NOT Christian and they are not Christians in the sense that the word Christian simply means a follower of Christ.  But Straightway leaders such as Dowell and his "Elder" Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila constantly label that which is obviously a false version of Christianity as Christianity.  Rather than say it's the commandment keepers who are the true Christians, they make these claims as if Christianity itself is Satanic, but once again the mainline denominations ARE NOT practicing TRUE CHRISTIANITY.  

What makes it confusing is that Straightway Truth Believers still claim Jesus/Yeshua as Lord and Savior, so the use of this expression that Christianity is evil turns out to be confusing for those who aren't paying close attention.  Those who don't deep dive on Straightways's belief in Jesus as Messiah would think their leaders mean that serving Jesus Himself is Satanic.  It's a subtle thing, but Freemasons do these exoteric (meaning meant for the masses)/esoteric (hidden meaning) forms of communication ALL THE TIME. It's very subtle, and in this case almost subliminal.  They get their followers to literally say, "Christianity is evil," and since they know the inside story as to why they say that, it relieves them from saying following Jesus Christ is Satanic, but the undergirding message of the statement is just that. 

Straightway also does a type of double-meaning gaslighting with the "Culture" shirt you often see them wearing.  The "Cult" part of the word is set off in its own rectangular box.  When freemasons do things like this, they are literally mocking us.  They are saying, "We will show people right to their face out in plain sight what we are, while lying to them with our words the whole time." They'll say the shirt is just them mocking how people call them a cult, but remember, there's an exoteric meaning and then the real esoteric meaning hidden beneath.  I would never wear a shirt like that to give people grounds to think that of me.  Why would they if not to mock us?

Jesus Culture, the Satanic kundalini spirit inducing, mantra repeating band out of Bethel Church in Redding, California, did the same thing with their name.  Seriously, I think these Freemasons laugh their "asses" off at people who are gullible enough to "buy what they're selling" and how they can brandish their identity out in the open and still trick their followers.  Man, I can't tell you how much they enjoy this mess.  Especially when they can get commandment keepers to fall for it.  It's such a feather in their cap and Satan rewards them for it, though in the end for these wolves in sheep's clothing there will be "hell to pay" if they don't repent.

So Satan sets the trap with denominations or groups such as Straightway Truth/Broadway Lies who lie in wait for new converts to commandment keeping.  They preach keeping the commandments, honor the proper Sabbath, the feasts and the levitical diet, but then couple the law with a requirement of complete obedience and submission to them, while they either keep you from other portions of the Truth or even worse, feed you sidetracking doctrines and dogmas to trap you in what could be contradictory to God's will.  And don't forget, they got all your money and assets in the process.

As mentioned before, Broadway Lies (I can no longer even refer to them as Straightway Truth) also promotes polygyny which can be quite a tempting prospect for some men.  What a perfect sidetrack for the few people who know the truth about the necessity to keep the commandments to get them off their purpose of sharing the gospel and instead replace that with the prospect of legal carnality! If you can get them all caught up in having multiple wives and making dozens of babies instead of getting out there and preaching truth, TRUTH OF WHICH ONLY A TINY PERCENT OF THE EARTH'S POPULATION KNOWS, then you can hinder the spreading of the gospel DURING THE LAST DAYS HARVEST! 

Instead of ministering to others out in these last day fields of the world, you can just get trapped on their compound focusing on building and sustaining the Straightway properties while feeding your face with delicious homegrown organic foods and meats, while the rest of the world only learns from your God DAMNED (unless they repent) false "prophets" and "elders" and such through barrages of thousands of YouTube videos and blogtalkradio broadcasts.  Meanwhile, Jesus' warning when he said of the last days, "And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!" is completely ignored and you're just shooting out babies like a Gatling gun and say, "But God said to be fruitful and multiply!"  There's a time and a season for everything.  Jesus warned there would be such a time to avoid having little babies.  I think that time is now. 

Remember, It only takes one lie to “poison the well”.  A drop of arsenic in what otherwise would be a glass of clean water still makes for a deadly concoction.  You are just as dead from a few little drops as you would be from an entire glass of it.  And such is the case with sin, even for people who keep most of the commandments: a little leaven leavens the whole lump.

What's even more damning is the basis of their Hebrew Israelite belief comes from Freemason founded Black Hebrew Israelite underpinnings. Straightway will not say they are Black Hebrew Israelites because they accept whites and other races into the group, but the founders of BHI were freemasons of the Prince Hall variety.  And it was during the 1800's that the freemasons went about to set up just such groups to capture and control Believers who could see the truth about the paganism in the apostate mainline denominations: the Jehovah's Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists and yes, the Black Hebrew Israelites were all set up then.  These groups would let you have your commandments, but poison you with other lies from the father of lies, Satan himself, and thereby keep you captured.

In addition to the above mentioned cults, the Messianic Jewish and Hebrew Roots movements also contains the same freemason elements of confusion and sidetracking teachings.  Many use the same freemason symbols and practice their own forms of idolatry stemming from the apostate, Talmudic version of Judaism.

Some of these sigils are in your face and others are subtle.  But suffice to say, Freemasons at the "in the know" level know everything that's being communicated.  They know the tricks of the exoteric meaning, "nice place for a perfectly round globe lamp right in the elbow of the upward triangle shape made by the ceiling and the pretty drapes when what they mean to communicate is the all-seeing eye in the capstone of the pyramid. Sure these things can happen innocuously from time to time, but when you see a pattern of it happening over and over again, these things are being done on purpose, and the main reason is to, in plain site, tell you who they are while they trick you with their words.

The "Star of David," incidentally, was never his star, but stems from ancient "sacred" geometry and has multiple meanings, including "as above, so below," and the sexual union, the male being the upward pointing triangle with the female body part the downward.

These groups, as does Straightway, also try to force people to address God in Hebrew, a language foreign to themselves, and thereby make God more foreign in their hearts.  This was the same goal of Catholicism when they used a dead language, Latin, clear up until the 1950's to say their masses, the people having absolutely no idea what was going on and feeling God was more foreign than ever. Ironically, it is God who created the languages and imposed their use at Babel (Genesis 10).  He is totally fine with us speaking to Him in our own languages. He happens to be completely fluent in them all. But I digress in order to stay focused on Black Hebrew Israelites.

As for their history related to freemasonry, the credited founders of the Black Hebrew Israelites were Frank Cherry, William Saunders Crowdy and another "key figure" was William Christian, all of whom were freemasons of the Prince Hall variety.

Cherry and Chowdry were said to have unique epiphanies of the Black Americans being the tribes of Israel and both started their own churches in the late 1880's. As with both the Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh Day Adventists who falsely prophecied a date for Jesus' return (1914 for the JW's, but then conveniently decided when He didn't show He was ruling invisibly; 1844 for the SDA'ers) a false prophecy of the time of Jesus' return was also made by Frank Cherry, who said Jesus would return in the year 2000.  False prophecies always go hand in hand with false movements.  

R.G. Stair, the now deceased founder and self-proclaimed "Last Days Prophet of God" of a "pentacostal" group called Overcomer ministries, also had a long litany of false prophecies. As an amazing coincidence (read sarcasm: there aren't any coincidences), Straightway Truth's leader, Charles Dowell, was once a part of Overcomer but has since distanced himself (although he recently allowed one of his elder's to refer to him as "Prophet" Stair in between 16:30 and 19 minutes on this video, also in which this same "elder" was allowed to say that Dowell himself is seen as the Moses of this generation with no argument from Dowell.) The megalomania that R.G. Stair exhibited still shows in Dowell, although perhaps at a slightly lesser clip.

But remember, if a "prophet" lies about just one thing, he is disqualified of all by Deuteronomy 18.

As for the founders of BHI, I did not find in my research that they said those who have been historically identified as Jews are Ashkazi, bloodline of Japheth, imposters, but more recent research from those who claim to be BHI adherants shows that they believe that the European descent "Jews" are actually from the wrong bloodline with regard to the sons of Noah so that it would be impossible for them to be of the lineage of Abraham.  They say those currently identified as Jews actually come from the line of Japheth rather than of Shem by whom Abraham's lineage derived. The book from Hebrews to Negroes that has been popularized (or made infamous, depending on who you ask) by the Kyrie Irving Psyop, is one that Straightway Truth/Broadway Lies promotes in this video through "Elder" Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila.   

What's difficult for the average Believer to do is to prove anything with regard to these lineages at all, any more than we can test science's carbon dating techniques or claims with regard to evolution to disprove them.  Throughout history we have all been lied to about so many matters large and small, and the history books are covered in half-truths and outright lies.

But seeing how none of us can prove anything they or the current "Jews" say with regard to their lineages, why waste time on the subject? Especially when, in the end, it doesn't matter! We are all part of another kingdom, those of who receive Jesus Christ as Lord are of another spiritual family!  

Jesus taught that every single person, seed of Abraham or not, must repent, accept Jesus' blood atonement, and keep the commandments in order to have everlasting life and have part of this new family.  Fighting over who's the real Jew when the average man can't prove a darn thing with that regard is futile.  I mean, do you really believe science and their DNA tests when they tell you we're derived from monkeys and that we live on an earth billions of years old?  Good grief!  And again I ask, what does it matter???

But what this sort of thing appeals to is the pride of a man.  He says, "oh, really, I am descendent of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob? I come from kings???"  And the man is beguiled by this new found self-importance and jumps headlong into a cult, when in reality every person on earth must humble himself, see himself for the sinner he is, and repent!

So now we have a group, started by freemasons, playing to the pride of a people that has been a minority group who also has a constant onslaught from the media that they are victims, now coming full force with their own narrative that says the Jews in Israel are imposters and that they are actually the real Jews.  What do we do now? Do the blacks wage war against those they say are imposters because the blacks are the real children of Israel and should be on the land?  

Or, is this whole debacle a way for the prophecy of the Jews (if indeed the "Ashkenazi" Jews are the real Jews) returning to Israel in the end times come to pass because American blacks (and those in agreement on this matter of all races) have a reason to hate the Jews for supposedly stealing their ancestry?  Will the resulting persecution return the "Ashkazis" to Israel faster since they are now so hated, even in America? And, are the famous "Ashkenazis" in power in finance, the media, and Hollywood purposely being pushed forward as lying, thieving debaucherous assholes to bring further persecution on their people as a form of a greater psyop to send them back? I mean, 51% of Jews live in the U.S., while only 31% live in Israel. To fulfill Ezekiel 37 there must be a bigger Aliyah.  I postulated in a prior episode that this is exactly what the "powers that be" are trying to do in order to control the prophecy (or at least think they control prophecy.) 

But again, if HBI beliefs are right, the European Jews (as imposters as they say they are) who are there now must be, I would think in their view, extracted.  Is there a plan for that???

For me, the proof that the traditional Jews are Jews is that they are there now, and the BHI blacks (except for a tiny number) are not.  I could stand corrected on this, but I can hardly buy anything from anyone these days on matters of lineage and in the end, it matters not.  Get right with Jesus Christ and keep the commandments.  This is all that matters.

And I can't get over that such a doctrine was started by Freemasons to begin with, whose job it is to lie to society and create narratives, psyops and controlled opposition to confuse and obfuscate the truth.  They've been doing clever 4d things like this for centuries.  They create the narratives and manipulate society therewith.  Once again, they give exoteric explanations "for the masses" for what they do, all the while knowing the hidden esoteric meanings which serve themselves and especially their master Lucifer.

You might say, with regard to Straightway, just because the founders of BHI were Masons, this does not mean that Straightway Truth/Broadway Lies is as well.

As someone who has studied masonic esoteric sigils for years, and I do mean years, the very logo of Straightway would beg to differ with you.  They couldn't have used more Freemasonic symbols/sigils in one emblem if they tried.

It has multiple elements of a masonic sigil:

1. The S in the center of shield could either represent a phoenix (an important occult symbol) or as with the S's wrapped around the sword handles: a serpent shape.

2. The crossed swords.

3. Which also represent the square and compass.

4. The shield itself.

5. The as above so below representation of the reflection of the shield almost as if in water.

Serpents in Masonic Symbolism

Crossed Swords in Masonic Symbolism

The square and compass as a symbol of "as above so below".

The reflection in water as a representation of as above so below.

The shape of shield itself is the one used for 32nd degree masons.  Is Charles Dowell a 32nd degree?

Now that you've seen every part of the Straightway Logo is reflected in freemason symbolism, take a gander at it again.

Many of you might think this is a joke.  Or many of you might say that the makers and approvers of the logo simply were being creative and using all of these elements innocuously.  I, myself, cannot believe this.  If the root of BHI is freemasonry, and the Hebrew Israelite Straightway group of today flashes freemason symbols, at least five of them, they are telling you who they are.

In this 2015 newletter, here we have the all-seeing eye.

Now check out the clenched fists of Charles Dowell and whoever is next to him on his right.

Another freemason, Pat Robertson posed with the same fist.

What does it mean to freemasons?

This goes so much deeper.  I have already discussed on other broadcasts how cults use the one book of the Bible where a foundation for a commune can be found (the Book of Acts), but this book is most easily proven false (sorry, the Catholics who gave us the Bible threw in some tares with the wheat). There are many contradictions and fallacies found within, such as:

1. Paul's Damascus Road story is told with conflicting facts on three different occasions (Acts 9, 22 & 26).  

2. The establishment of a different rule set for believing Gentiles (Acts 15, 21) than the believing Jews (a thing Jesus did not teach, as He told the apostles to teach the nations whatsoever he had (already) commanded them. (see Matthew 28). 

3. False narratives that the apostles just stayed holed up in Jerusalem (Acts 1-15) when the end of Mark says that they went everywhere preaching the gospel (Mark 16).  

4. That Peter needed a vision of a descending vision of unclean beasts (Acts 10) to figure out to go preach to the Gentiles when Jesus had told them to "preach the gospel to every creature" (Mark 16) and to all the nations (Matthew 28) right before He ascended to heaven. How do Peter and all the apostles forget the GREAT COMMISSION and need a vision several years later to get going on preaching the gospel to Gentiles!!!???  Nonsense!

Acts is, at least in part, a fiction, and the passages in Acts 2 and Acts 4 that say the Believers had all things in common, lived and broke bread together, and gave all their money to the apostles for distribution, has given the supposed "biblical" grounds for communal living cults such as Straightway to take all their adherants' money and to redistribute those funds as they see fit, while keeping the adherants next to penniless, entrapping them and making it quite difficult for them to leave even if they so desire.  If Straightway really kept the law they would keep only the tythe of their adherants increase as was given to the Levitical priesthood. We will discuss this further in another blog/podcast.  

In the meantime, if you are surprised about what's just been said about Acts, do your own reading on the four points above. These contradictions are irrefutable.  Search out the Bible yourself. Acts is "whacks" and is the basis for which all cults who call themselves "Christian" get started. It's time to let it go of its lies and honor the teachings of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as found in the Gospels and the Book of Revelation.  

Formerly "Gentile" Believers are just that, former Gentiles, because once Jesus brings us into the fold, we are made ONE FOLD with the Jewish Believers, and we all have THE SAME MIND, that is TO KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS as given by God through Moses and the Prophets.

Thanks so much for reading this far.  If you are a member of Straightway Truth/Broadway Lies, or any similar cult and you have lost your peace and agreement with what goes on in the groups, I pray, in the mighty name of Jesus that you may get free of the cult for which you are a part and walk with your Lord and Savior Jesus Christ the Righteous in perfect freedom.  A-men.